Prospective students do not encounter one neatly named field. Schools publish kinesiology, exercise science, exercise physiology, human performance, and adjacent tracks under overlapping federal classifications. A generic top-ten list erases the difference, while raw IPEDS tables make the reader perform the comparison themselves.
The harder problem was fairness. Associate, bachelor’s, master’s, and doctoral programs report different signals and lead to different decisions. The site needed to compare programs inside the right peer group, show the numbers behind each result, and explain where public coverage ends.
The finished architecture treats the ranking as a research product. National pages establish the peer set, state pages narrow the geography, career guides explain the destination, and the methodology exposes the calculation holding it together.